[Download this video to your computer | Upload to iPod, PSP]
I
have been thinking lately about the power of experiential learning as I have
been finishing an article that will soon be published in the Clinical Law
Review, “Teaching Reflective Lawyering in a Small Case Litigation Clinic: A
Love Letter to my Clinic.” I have tried
to describe how the shared experience of a clinical semester helps my students
develop a complex, nuanced and deeply moral model of lawyerly problem solving.
I think the relationships my students develop with their clients and with each
other, are a very important part of the process. When it works well, reflection on the
professional aspects of those relationships is at the core of the clinical
experience. I think that is how I
refined my professional interpersonal skills and I think that is part of the
reason why the friendships formed in clinics and other active contexts are
often deeper and more long lasting than other law school friendships. That is what I hear in the comments of Sara Upton and Gina DelChiaro in this clip.
[Download this this video to your computer | Upload to iPod, PSP]
In
this clip, Gina DelChiaro talks about how her clinical experience came up in
interviews and was one of the things that gave her a foothold when she first
started work. Both those observations
hold true for many people and reflect an important feature of clinical
education. Clinics present us with the kinds of real, complex and textured
situations that confront lawyers. Interviewers often ask about experience with
real problems so they can listen to whether the interviewee "sounds like a
lawyer" -- one of those “I am not sure I can define it, but I know it when
I hear it” sort of things.
I
hope this will motivate the thought I am offering: Complex lawyering situations
are analyzable into simpler constituent parts or elements, as we often call
them in the law.
For
example, a client will present a problem that requires analysis of a statute,
understanding the client's goals and helping the client make a decision. The
classroom can provide a good setting in which to learn to analyze a statute and
also think about client autonomy and the process of decision making. But the
clinic is the place where you can put those elements together and see how the
whole, complex, interdependent process fits together.
The
whole is definitely more than the sum of its parts and, in my experience, good
lawyers add the most value through their higher order problem solving skills -
the process of putting all the pieces together.
For
me, that higher order integration has always had a strong intuitive feel; I
either see the whole or I don't and while I have spent a lot of time thinking
about that process, I still find it powerful and a bit mysterious. But I
usually recognize that skill when I hear others exercise it and I also derive
real comfort from the feeling of having a complex situation fall into a
discernible pattern or present a recognizable path.
-- Ian
Weinstein
Fordham, Law School, Clinical Legal Education,
Law Clinic, Pro Bono Work, Legal Education, Legal Pedagogy, Teaching Law, Student Lawyers, Law Student, Experiential Learning